Contextuality.

[Charles]

Greetings, <BR> <BR>Suppose that a man made a discovery that shed a new light on all Scinece, Religion, and Philosophy (and indeed, all human understanding). What if it simply covered everything, explaining the Universe and our place in the Universe, in a new-but-ancient, and simple way. A discovery that was undeniable and self-evident. So obvious in fact that it had evaded discovery until now simply because of its obvious nature. <BR> <BR>What would you do with such a discovery? <BR> <BR>I ask this question not to those looking for answers, but rather to those who run this "Mind Power" business. They stand so close to the truth, the Logos, that I am amazed. But we've all stood in the same place for several thousand years and still missed the obvious. Never-the-less, it surprises me every time I see a Physist plot portions of the Universal Energy Graph and still not get the whole picture. And it surprises me even more to see those who know the power of thought (Eenergy or Genergy) yet still manage to miss the big picture. It is astounding how so many people have been so close to the mark, yet still missed it. And for thousands of years. One can only wonder at this, and attribute it to some delusion caused by some external (or internal) force(s). <BR> <BR>What's your take on this? <BR> <BR>Thanks, and be excellent, <BR> <BR>Charles

[dkistner]

I'm not part of Mindtek--just one of its biggest fans--but I'd like to respond to this question from my own personal perspective. <BR> <BR>I think human perception (of truth or anything else) requires--at least at this stage in human development--a certain limiting subject/objectivity, which is characteristic of one aspect of our dimensional reality but is not characteristic of all possible dimensions/realities. Intellectually understanding the concept of omnijectivity (the belief that consciousness and the physical world are not separate) and actually being omnijective are two different things! <BR> <BR>Personally, I think to grasp the big picture (and I wonder if that's even possible), one must allow oneself to tap into--no, become one with--the "universal mind," the implicate order, unity consciousness--our words are limiting metaphorical filters and fail to adequately describe the indescribable, but you get the gist. We grasp the big picture not by standing outside of it and trying to perceive it or understand it or contrast one part of it with another part of it, but by merging into the flow of it. <BR> <BR>To come anywhere near at-one-ness with "the truth" (and I believe even truth has infinite aspects), one must be willing to extend beyond the boundaries of what seems so solid, what's already known; to examine consciously what are for most people unconscious assumptions about the nature of reality. To do so can be terribly exciting but also utterly terrifying. The universe as we don't know it is so awesome, seeing it in its full splendor could well short us out! <BR> <BR>I'm not familiar with the terms "Eenergy" or "Genergy." Can you elaborate? Can you recommend some good books?